Skip to main content

Differences Between Venture Builder and Other Models


Understanding the unique characteristics of a venture builder is crucial, as there's often confusion about how it compares to other entities in the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Common misconceptions conflate venture builders with startup incubators or accelerators, but these comparisons are based on incorrect premises.

This section aims to clarify essential concepts, delineating the distinct role of venture builder management and its place within the broader entrepreneurial landscape. By dispelling common misconceptions, we hope to provide a clearer understanding of what sets venture builders apart and how they contribute uniquely to the growth and development of startups.

Incubators and Accelerators

Venture builders stand apart from accelerators and business incubators due to a fundamental distinction: while incubators and accelerators offer support to companies for a limited time and typically specialize in a specific phase of business development, a venture builder is a long-term co-founder that evolves alongside the company.

The builder as a co-founder is a crucial concept to grasp. This relationship is the primary differentiator between a venture builder and other entities like accelerators, incubators, or investment funds. A venture builder's engagement with its portfolio companies is enduring. It involves deep involvement in the startups it fosters, lasting until the partnership is dissolved. In essence, the builder's connection with these companies isn't marked by an expiration date but aligns with the long-term perspective of entrepreneurial partnerships. A venture builder is, in effect, a collective co-founder.

The following table illustrates how different entities assist startups at various stages of their business journey:

TABLE 1-3

Institutions that help startups in different stages of maturity

Ideation

Testing

Sales

Escalated

Incubator

Accelerator

Venture Builder

Source: Institutions that help startups in different stages of maturity. “Builder's Handbook: Builder's Guide” by Taig Mac Carthy, September 16, 2019

With this perspective, many venture builders tailor their startup creation and development processes to align with the various phases through which a startup evolves.

This means that a venture builder may categorize its startups as being in either the incubation or acceleration phase. However, this classification doesn't imply that the builder's involvement is confined to only one of these stages. Rather, it's a reference to the current maturation stage of each startup in their portfolio.

Consequently, it's quite common for companies incubated within a venture builder to participate in external acceleration programs. This might seem surprising to those unfamiliar with the venture building model, but it actually aligns perfectly with the builder's approach of supporting startups through various development stages.

Therefore, a more apt comparison would be between different types of co-founders, rather than equating venture builders with other startup support institutions.

Types of Co-founder

Reiterating an important concept: the venture builder is, in essence, a co-founder. Like any co-founder, the builder plays a significant role in various aspects of the startup, including company administration, product development, talent recruitment, and financing.

The management team of a venture builder actively participates in the ideation and creation of the product. Following this initial phase, they continue to co-lead the company through marketing, scaling, and internationalization phases, with no predefined endpoint.

To accurately compare a venture builder to entities operating at a similar level within the startup ecosystem, we should look at other types of co-founders. The following table provides a comparison of some key characteristics of different types of co-founders or partners who may be involved in the creation of a startup.

TABLE 1-4

Types of co-founder

Working partner

Venture builder

Equity partner

Contribution to product development

High

High

Low

Contribution to commercial activity and marketing

High

High

Low

Shares you own

High

High

Low

Contributed financial capital

Low

Half

High

Source: The types of co-founder. “Builder's Handbook: Builder's Guide” by Taig Mac Carthy, September 16, 2019

This table offers a comparative analysis of different types of co-founders: Working Partners, Venture Builders, and Equity Partners. It highlights the varying levels of con

Considering this comparative framework, we can assert that a venture builder is akin to a working partner, contributing more financial capital and exercising greater control over the company. This comparison highlights a distinct difference from a purely capitalist partner, whose primary contribution is financial.

Additionally, it's important to note the unique role of venture builders that specialize in specific verticals, like virtual reality, artificial intelligence, or robotics. In these cases, as outlined in the section on transfer instruments, the builder's contribution to product development significantly exceeds that of any other partner. This specialized input is a defining feature of venture builders in such niches, further distinguishing their role from other types of co-founders or partners in the startup ecosystem.